Are there “two conscience clauses” for abortion in French law?

20/01/2017

On January 17, 2017 the French High Council for Equality between men and women (HCE) published a report on the measures taken in the past 3 years to facilitate access to abortion. Out of the 35 recommendations made by the HCE at the end of 2013, the government has implemented more than two thirds.

Nevertheless the HCE considers that abortion cannot be “a full-blown right” as long as doctors can recourse to a special conscience clause for abortion. In the report this is stated as follows:

« Remove the conscience clause which is explicitly stated in article L.2212-8 of the Public Health Code as follows: « A doctor can never be forced to do a voluntary interruption of pregnancy” as well as for the other health professionals mentioned in the same article. The recourse to “conscience clause” is already accepted in a general manner for all health care workers for all medical procedures.”

In Article L2212-8 the conscience clause appears in the legislative part of the Public Health Code, which contains the laws voted by the Parliament.

The second text, which the HCE regards as another conscience clause, would be, for doctors for instance, the one in Article R.4127-47, which states:

“Regardless of the circumstances, the continuity of patient care must be assured. Barring emergencies or cases where he would be failing to do his altruistic duty, a doctor has the right to refuse care for personal or professional reasons. If he refuses to fulfill his mission, he must notify the patient and transfer to the physician indicated by the patient, the appropriate information for continuing the patient’s care.”

Article R.4127-47 is included in the doctors “Code of Ethics”, the set of rights and obligations for their profession. They are included in the legislative part of the Public Health Code, which contains the decrees and ministerial rulings published by the government.

Therefore, according to the HCE, there are “two conscience clauses », one specifically for abortion, and another one of a more general nature. And both clauses would have the same scope and concern all healthcare personnel. Conclusion, there is one clause too many (that of Public Health Code Art. L2212-8), which must be removed so as not to “stigmatize” abortion compared to other medical procedures.

This argument is deceitful for at least 4 different reasons.

1° The general clause existed prior to the 1975 abortion law. If it was deemed judicious by the legislature to introduce a specific clause when voting this law, it was precisely because doctors needed an increased protection due to the seriousness of abortion. The risk of taking an innocent life is not the same as the risk of refusing to care for a patient, or refusing to prescribe a particular medical treatment.

 

2° The general clause for doctors has more restrictive coverage. It begins with the following principle: “Regardless of the circumstances, the continuity of patient care must be ensured.” This principle limits a doctor’s discretionary authority in at least two cases mentioned in the text, “cases of emergency and cases where he would be failing to altruistic his duty”. In fact this legal framework is more restrictive and binding for the doctor than the solemn statement whereby “a doctor can never be forced to do a voluntary interruption of pregnancy.”

3° The general clause is by nature regulatory and not legislative. This is certainly a major difference. A law is a much stronger guarantee of liberty than a ministerial decree. A law can only be changed by another law discussed in Parliament, with debates, amendments, votes, possibly liable to censure by the Constitutional Council, etc. A decree can be modified overnight by the government without taking heed of public opinion or elected officials. If the conscience clause is removed from Art. L2212-8 of the Public Health Code, which is legislative, only Art. R.4127-47, which is regulatory and therefore less defensive, will remain.

4° The general clause does not apply to all healthcare personnel. It is true that midwives do have a general clause similar to that for doctors (Public Health Code Art. R.4127-328) as do nurses since last November (Art. R.4312-12 of the same code). Nevertheless these are still general clauses that are regulatory in nature, thus the same restrictions and conditions apply as those for doctors (see analysis above in N° 2 and N°3). Furthermore, there are additional professionals who may be called upon to be directly or indirectly involved in an abortion, such as nurse’s aides. However the specific clause for abortion clearly states that “No midwife, nurse, nor any medical auxiliary personnel regardless of their position, can be forced to participate in abortions”.

HCE’s request to remove the specific conscience clause for abortion is inadmissible, because it is based on an inaccurate analysis of the current legislation. It is based more on an ideological approach than a practical necessity: there is no real problem to abort due to an exaggerated recourse to freedom of conscience.

In fact, not only should this conscience clause not be removed but it should, on the contrary, be reinforced. Many cases of discrimination have been observed, during medical training or employment interviews, at the expense of young people who do not wish to perform abortions. Furthermore, one profession is not covered by this clause, although involved in medically-induced abortions: pharmacists. In fact, pharmacists may be forced to directly participate in abortions, and required to provide products for medical abortions to be performed by doctors or midwives. It is paradoxical that dentists and orthopedists are covered by this conscience clause as medical auxiliary personnel, but not pharmacists.

There are only three conscience clauses for healthcare personnel: one for abortion, one for sterilization (Public Health Code Art. L2123-1) and one for human embryo research (Art. L2151-7-1 of the same code). In every instance, these are serious irreversible procedures affecting the lives of human beings, those already conceived, or else the body’s integrity by removing the capacity to procreate. For these reasons it is completely legitimate to protect the freedom of conscience of those who refuse to perform such procedures.

Freedom of conscience is an invaluable right, protected by the French Constitution and major international texts. Trying to contest this for abortion cases would weaken this very premise and open the door more easily to further attacks.

Restez informé de nos dernières actualités

Articles récents

[CP]- Abortion in the Constitution: The Wrong Debate

[CP]- Abortion in the Constitution: The Wrong Debate

The French National Assembly is to examine tomorrow a law proposal tabled by LFI (La France Insoumise) suggesting that “Nobody may undermine the right for abortion and contraception. The law guarantees that any person who so wishes should have free and effective access to such rights.” Alliance VITA denounces this as the wrong debate.

French Bill to Allow Abortions at 14 Weeks of Pregnancy

French Bill to Allow Abortions at 14 Weeks of Pregnancy

On Friday June 7, the French Senate adopted an amendment introduced by Senator Laurence Rossignol, to extend the time limit for legal abortions from 12 to 14 weeks of pregnancy, as part of the country’s new health bill. Following a rising ‘surprise’ vote, in a practically vacant session, 12 voted in favor and 10 against. […]

« Euthanasia, Behind the Scenes » (Belgian Book Release)

« Euthanasia, Behind the Scenes » (Belgian Book Release)

“Euthanasia, Behind the Scenes”, is a new book published by Mols, on the end-of-life and the consequences of euthanasia. The foreword of the book was written Jacques RICOT, philosopher, and Dr Timothy DEVOS, hematologist and professor at Leuven University Hospital, coordinated the contributions from 8 well-known Belgian caregivers specialized in palliative care, including university teachers, […]

[Press Release] European Elections: VITA Focuses on Fragile Generations

[Press Release] European Elections: VITA Focuses on Fragile Generations

Two days before the European elections, Alliance VITA gives the results of its awareness campaign for “Fragile Generations”. While all across Europe, countries are facing the social and humanitarian challenges of demographic decline and population ageing, the French are becoming more aware of the urgent need to foster intergenerational solidarity. The three steps of the […]

ART Procreation Business in Belgium: It’s Already There

ART Procreation Business in Belgium: It’s Already There

In order to know the current rates being offered for oocyte donations, a Belgian journalist visited several fertility clinics throughout the country. None of the clinics openly displayed their prices, since the Belgian law of July 6, 2007 concerning assisted reproductive techniques (ART) prohibits human gametes from being bought and sold. As stated in Article […]

UN Requests that France Not Condemn Vincent Lambert to Death

UN Requests that France Not Condemn Vincent Lambert to Death

The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), is composed of independent experts in charge with implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). On May 3, this UN Committee requested from France “interim measures”: the decision, rendered by the French Council of State on April 24, to […]

France National Assembly to Investigate Child Welfare Programs

While the French government is deliberating on child welfare services, the National Assembly has appointed a task team to investigate on welfare and child support in charge of the follow up of children placed away from home.   This decision follows a controversial broadcast on French television (Channel “France 3”), which denounced several flaws in […]

Versailles Court Condemns Web Host for Advertising Surrogacy

On February 26, 2019, the High Court in Versailles condemned the web host provider of a Spanish website, for advertising surrogacy services in France. This decision was rendered after the Spanish website Subrogalia refused to delete their surrogacy ads which targeted French people. Already in 2016, the Lawyer’s Association for Children issued Subrogalia a formal […]

Inadmissibly Endorsing Infanticide

Alliance VITA firmly denounces the media coverage via “Konbini” (a French pop culture website), regarding a woman who declares having killed her severely disabled 3-year-old child more than 30 years ago. Caroline Roux, Alliance Vita’s Assistant General Delegate asserts:  “It is unacceptable to publicly endorse infanticide. All children have the right to be protected, especially […]

Ageing And Discrimination: A National and European Major Issue

On February 27, a European Charter on Advanced Age was published to promote consideration for older persons. This charter intends to challenge the candidates in the upcoming European elections, (May 23-26) to give older people an appropriate and dignified place in today’s society. The charter was drafted by influential persons and doctors from various associations […]

China’s CRISPR Twins Medical Scandal: New Revelations

New revelations have been reported in the case of the Chinese scientist who first used the CRISPR-Cas9 technique to genetically modify twin babies’ genes before birth. The birth announcement of twin girls in China last November sparked international condemnation for violating scientific guidelines against the use of gene-edited embryos to start pregnancies. He Jiankui admitted […]

Spain Cracks Down on International Surrogacy

On February 13, the Spanish Consulate in Kiev refused to register babies born to surrogate mothers in Ukraine. Spain intends to dissuade its citizens from having recourse to this practice, which is a serious violation of human rights. A source from the Ministry of Justice explains that “These parents have resorted to a practice that […]

Parental Leave Policies: French Report Recommends Reform

On February 26, 2019 the French High Council for the Family, Childhood and the Elderly issued a report recommending reform in parental leave policies to improve balance between work and family life. Based on the shortcomings observed in the parental leave reform implemented in 2015, the recent report examines the issue of parents caring for […]

Genetic Testing: DNA Kit Sales Skyrocketing

The American scientific magazine MIT Review, from the renowned University of Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology has just published a report estimating that more than 26 million people have already used these kits to have their DNA tested. If this growth trend continues, the companies selling these kits will have the “genetic fingerprints” of more […]

Delaying Pregnancy Becomes More Frequent in Developed World

On January 23, 2019, the French National Institute of Demographic Studies (INED) published the research results by 2 scientists on late motherhood, which is occurring more and more frequently in the developed countries. In the 20th century, economic and social developments have markedly changed women’s fertility patterns in the developed countries. These researchers account for […]

Suicides in France: Improve Understanding to Improve Prevention

On February 5, 2019 to mark the national day dedicated to preventing suicide, the French public health agency published several well-documented articles on suicide and attempted suicides in France over the past several years. High suicide rate in France According to the Center of Epidemiology statistics investigating medical causes of death, in 2015 there were […]

Euthanasia in the Netherlands: A Liberal Interpretation of the Law

The European Institute of Bioethics has evaluated the new medical code regarding Euthanasia, recently published by the regional euthanasia commissions in the Netherlands. This text explains how legal criteria relating to euthanasia must be interpreted, and reveals the ambiguities and contradictions of how this practice continues to drift off-course. According to the latest report, in […]